©
| Equations |
Frequency |
Measurement |
Components |
Technology |
| Preface | Anomalies | Physics | Waves | Particles | Slang | Voodoo | Paradox |
Preface, Thoughts of Ron
The difference between theory & reality
In 1746 physicist Pieter van Musschenbroek, of Leiden University in the Nederlands, tried pumping electricity from an electrostatic generator into a jar of water. There's no accounting for some people. Nothing seemed to happen but, when he picked up the jar to disconnect it, he got an almighty wallop. The Leyden Jar was born, called a condenser, because it held 'condensed' electricity!
Some of the theory taken for granted, taught in our colleges & universities comes from then, or earlier. Many formulae date back 150 years or more. Benjamin Franklin postulated in 1752 that electricity consisted of positively charged fluid & thus flowed from positive to negative. Some physicists still insist this is so, despite contrary proofs before & after the dawn of the 20th Century.
The terms 'positive (+) & negative (-)' come from his idea that one pole had more electricity & the other had less. So if he had drawn the correct conclusion from his lightning experiments we would now be talking about the electron as a positive charge. It is entirely just a form of words, all this hoo-hah over polarity would never have happened.
Too late to change it now, otherwise we will have an entire generation that can't understand one another. So what's new?
Most of the theoretical body of 'knowledge' that is available for all is based on mistaken assumptions from a time long before today's analytical tools became available. Formulae & equations work for most undemanding applications. This is because they were developed to fit the observed phenomena & those assumptions. It is akin to doctors believing in blood letting to cure diseases, because patients sometimes recovered.
Misinformation.
This vast store of misinformation is perpetuated by the establishment. Tutors & lecturers stick with it because to do otherwise may cost them their livelyhoods. Cutting edge research is frequently held up & costs increased because of this. If we are ever to break with our past & move forward we must get it right. In the middle ages a conservative & powerful church held back human development.
We are less likely to be burnt at the stake these days for speaking against convention. But those who do may be ostracised from the physics community for their views. It is difficult to estimate how much this head in the sand attitude has held us back.
The human spirit evolved by questing for new knowledge & exploring the unknown. If we are ever to explore space we must first get a truer picture of how the universe works.
Ivor Catt. Electromagnetism & The Catt Anomaly. A fresh look at reality. |
It is still taught that electric current causes a rotating magnetic field. It was known in 1898 that the reverse is the case. The following quote, taken from Ivor Catt's web site, is part of a preface by Malcolm Davidson.
It is important that the student should bear in mind that, although we are accustomed to speak of the current as flowing in the wire in one direction or the other, this is a mere form of words. What we call the current in the wire is, to a very large extent, a process going on in the space or material outside the wire. >
< With Ivor's good counsel and the help and support of David Walton, I began to uncover a treasure trove of knowledge. My first so-called discovery was in an engineering library at Marconi Elliott Avionics, where I found a book by J.A. Fleming from 1898. On page 80 he states;
A further quote from the same preface.
< Those of you who feel that many of the ideas in this book are not mainstream should find a copy of "Standard Handbook for Electrical Engineers" by Donald G. Fink and H. Wayne Beaty. In all editions up to and including 12 (published in 1987), there is a section entitled "Electromagnetic Wave Propagation Phenomena".
This seminal work gives a clear and unambiguous description of the role that conventional electric current plays in energy flow.
The usually accepted view that the conductor current produces the magnetic field surrounding it must be displaced by the more appropriate one that the electromagnetic field surrounding the conductor produces, through a small drain on the energy supply, the current in the conductor.
Although the value of the latter may be used in computing the transmitted energy, one should clearly recognize that physically this current produces only a loss and in no way has a direct part in the phenomenon of power transmission.
It should be noted that the 13th edition has deleted this entry, as this excellent description has been replaced by more "up to date material"! As engineers, academics and scientists, are we interested in truth, or do we just pay lip service to it, justifying our actions as not wanting to rock the boat? >
There we have it, it has been know since the late 1800s that electricity is transmitted by electromagnetic waves. The wire acts merely as a guide, in the process absorbing some energy from the wave in resistance losses. This knowledge has effectively been suppressed since 1987.
The truth is that electricity no more flows in a copper wire than water flows in the copper of a pipe. The copper is a guide for the real current, in the medium or vacuum around the wire, As the copper pipe guides the flow of water through the space inside. In fact it can guide electricity within it under suitable conditions (wave guides).
The resultant magnetic component, rotating around the wire, induces electron activity within. Causing energy loss & heating with an imperfect conductor. High frequency skin effect is due to the slow speed of electron penetration. Before outer electrons can tell their mates about the field, it has reversed.
It is still taught that the magnetic field is merely a byproduct of the current. In reality it is the other way round, the current we are able to measure is a predictable artifact of the magnetic phenomena. Once we are able to make the intellectual leap in accepting this it all starts to fall into place.
|
Author; Ron Lebar. |
|
A Form of Words
On various pages of this site, including this one, we refer to current flow, capacitors being charged etc. This is merely a convenient form of words, based on the habits of over two centuries. It does not mean we accede to the dualist or particle theories. Nor do we accept quantum mechanics, the uncertainty principle & all their ramifications.
Until we get our house in order, a new form of language, in keeping with reality, will not fully evolve. So, for the present, we are stuck with the arcane way of describing things. Together with the arcane theology called 'modern physics'.
|
|
|
If you spot any factual mistakes or 'typos' please feel free to let us know. We are not perfect & won't sulk over constructive criticism.
Regards & thanks for reaching our Site, an ongoing project. Courtesy, Excellence & Value. Theory. Updated on the 29th of October 2004. © Ron Lebar, Author.
Watch this space.
The standard others are judged by.